![]() Many other synthesizer keyboards support polyphonic playback so that capable of playing multiple audible notes at the same time mimicking an analog piano's polyphonic abilities.Īs far as homophonics are concerned, YourDictionary describes. Stringed instruments would be considered polyphonic to a degree because a musician are capable of playing two strings at the same time with one bow. Now a grand piano is considered polyphonic because you can play multiple notes at the same time like playing a cord or triad. If a voice is to be reproduced synthetically with the sampler on a polyphonic synthesizer, it then can support multiple playback of the audible voice. Many synthesizers are only capable of monophonic playback being able to play sound from only one depressed key on the keyboard at a time and at any given point in time regardless of how many keys are depressed at the same given point in time. More examples of monophonic instruments include trumpet or a trombone. Therefore a singer’s voice is considered monophonic and not polyphonic because the singer can only reproduce one audible voice at a time. Better perhaps to talk of Monophony and Counterpoint.įrom my understanding polyphonics are a single instruments ability to play two or more notes concurrently (at the same time). A homophonic SATB note-for-note harmonisation of a hymn tune could be called polyphonic - it has 4 voices! A one-oscillator synth is monophonic, a 2,4,20. It doesn't always mean several INDEPENDENT voices. You'll generally find both.Īlso, be clear over your definition of 'polyphony'. Just look for homophonic and polyphonic elements in it. A bit of homophony.ĭon't suffer over whether a particular piece of music is Homophony or Polyphony. But every now and again there'll be a bit that could have come straight out of a traditional hymn book. Add the idea that it's effective to have the bass rise where the melody falls, that a long note in the melody works well against a little run in the bass and there's even more. Add a bass line that does anything more interesting than just stick on I, IV or V and we're beginning to get an element of polyphony. Homophony and Polyphony are not absolute, mutually exclusive terms.Ī melody with strummed guitar chords is pretty much homophonic. How about the early organum with parallels of 5ths? Hindemith says, this was not real polyphony, just a simple preliminary stage of it. I agree, that some styles are difficult to categorize as one of these 2 types. The more 2 or more voices are independent, leading their own way or imitating each other, the more we are speaking about polyphony, while a setting of voices, that are streaming together horizontally in equal rhythm accompanying a tune we have a homophonic setting.įor example, in a rock song, even if there is an independent melody developing in the electric guitar playing at the same time as the vocal, wouldn't the guitar melody still take a backseat to the vocal? Is this polyphonic? ![]() ![]() Mind that a) homophony and b) polyphony are just 2 different aspects of composing or analyzing a set of voicings:Ī) is prioritizing the vertical aspect, as you say the chords, b) is concerning the horizontal aspect of the voicing: the lines. ![]() Would I be correct if I were to define homophony vs polyphony as chords vs lines? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |